Anyone see this Supreme Court decision a few months ago? NY Times story:
And the actual decision:
I always have an opinion on legislated economics, but I'd like to hear others...
Source Dorks is a pop culture blog written by a circle of friends who frequently meet to play games and geek out at Source Comics and Games in the suburbs of Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(343)
-
▼
October
(35)
- Wired Rocks
- Attention Dorks!
- Tokyo Dance Trooper
- More Mr. Wonderful
- The Definitive Leopard Review
- Mayfair Games Fixes Prices
- picture, thousand words, all that
- How To Cheat at Chess
- The Sea and Cake "Everybody"
- Radiolab @ The Fitzgerald
- Price Fixing Legalized
- Good Card Art
- Qhorin's Pantheon of Boardgaming
- My Side Projects
- Film Noir Mondays
- This Is What You Wanted All Along
- Partying with the 'Dickster'
- The RZA Explains "My Guitar Gently Weeps"
- Benefits and Birthdays
- E For All
- The League of Extrordinary Gentlemen: The Black Do...
- Lol Blade Runner
- Simon Pegg is Scotty!
- A Minor Internet Celebrity is Born
- Leroy Jenkins Digested By Ad Agencies
- Internet People! - The Meth Minute 39
- My Favorite Exploitation Flick
- "I'm here because I'm bored!"
- Looks Like I Chose A Bad Time To Leave Town
- Just Watch
- On a Similar Note
- Wu Tang + The Beatles
- Boing Boing TV
- Kick, Punch It's All In The Mind
- Mr. Wonderful Part Three
-
▼
October
(35)
3 comments:
Don't know enough about how the agreements usually work. I would guess though that as long as there are a healthy number of competitors this isn't necessarily a bad thing.
Dunno. When companies get together to create fixed prices I usually feel like they're trying to do an end run around actually competing with each other.
In this case which legislation of economics did you have an opinion on? The one where they banned it or unbanned it?
I don't have an opinion myself yet because I am still working through my reaction to the Bush administration taint on the issue.
Post a Comment